beetle’s perspective

Landscape Ecology vol. 3 no. 2 pp 87-96 (1989)

88

that is heterogeneous from the perspective of a

ground-dwelling harvester ant, for example, may

be contained within one or two seemingly homo-

geneous patches from the perspective of a foraging

bird or a grazing ungulate.

Our thesis is that the ideas and approaches of

landscape ecology should apply at any scale of in-

vestigation and that landscape ecology is likely to

develop a strong conceptual and theoretical foun-

dation only if we shed the preoccupation with

human-scaled landscapes and adopt a multi-scale

perspective on landscape patterns and dynamics. In

particular, we advocate investigations of landscape

beetle’s perspective

patterns and their effects at small,

beetle’s perspective

dynamics or nutrient cy-

cling in laboratory ecosystems (Taub 1974). There

are several advantages of this microlandscape ap-

proach: (1) measurements may be taken with a level

of detail that is difficult to attain at a broader scale;

(2) sample sizes may be greater or sampling at a

given intensity may provide a more accurate

representation of the phenomenon being investigat-

ed; (3) experimental manipulations may be con-

ducted with relative ease, and (4) experiments or

observations may be replicated over many plots or

treatments with relative ease. Collectively, these

features enhance our ability to study landscapes in

a rigorous fashion and to move from Troll’s assess-

beetle’s perspective

ment of landscape ecology as ‘an attitude’

beetle’s perspective相关文档

最新文档

返回顶部